![]() ![]() All of this bodes well for the eventual migration to 3nm Apple Mac processors. ![]() MacBook Pro range and the iMac, these Macs will in turn empower pro users with more of what they need. The promise here certainly seems to be that when Apple does M-power the 14- and 16-in. The Mac mini can run an Apple XDR and a 4K display together. The 5-nanometer chip is also predicted to run at 3.2GHz (CPU/GPU) with 16GB max memory - and to run up to three displays. To gain an extra four active CPU cores for just 6 watts of power sounds like a pretty good design choice to me. That matches up well to suggest a faster performing version of the same basic processor with more active cores.įor comparison, the M1 Mac mini hits 39 watts, while the 2018 Intel Mac mini maxed at 122 watts. The report claims power maxes out at 45 watts on these processors. There are some additional stats in the CPU Monkey report, which warns the results are based on a “pre-sample," whatever that means - and it could quite easily consist of educated guesses concerning the chips - but they fit current expectation. In comparison to the record-setting M1 chip everyone is talking, Intel is fighting back (using a selection of statistics I’d like to challenge) with a processor that has 8 CPU and 8 GPU cores. So, about the source: processor benchmarking site CPU Monkey claims Apple’s next big chip will be called the M1X, and looks like this: That means these Macs should be significantly faster than the first-generation M1 machines, and will deliver even more impressive graphics performance, thanks to that dedicated GPU and use of Metal. What’s a little unexpected is that these chips also seem to possess more dedicated graphics cores. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |